Module 7
Module 7

Find trades and compare proposals

Three proposals for the same kitchen can differ by thirty thousand dollars and still be describing the same work, or they can be within two thousand of each other and describing three different jobs. This module teaches you to tell which is which: how to give bidders a consistent scope, what to ask, what to check, and how to level proposals so that the numbers you compare describe the same job. Levelling improves your understanding of what each bidder has offered; it does not establish the final cost, which only the finished project does.

1. What a proposal is, and is not Understand

Four words get used as if they meant the same thing. They do not, and the difference is where money is often lost.

  • An estimate is an opinion of probable cost. It can be a number on the back of a card after a walk-through or a page of line items. Either way it is not a promise. Contractors give estimates when the scope is not yet defined well enough to promise anything.
  • A bid or quote is an offer to do a described scope for a stated price under stated conditions. Its value depends entirely on how well the scope is described. A bid against a vague scope is an estimate wearing a suit.
  • A proposal is a bid plus the contractor's terms: what is included and excluded, allowances, payment schedule, how changes are priced, schedule, warranty. Most residential contractors send proposals. The terms are often more consequential than the price.
  • A contract is the signed agreement. In many places the proposal becomes the contract when you sign it, which means every line you did not read is now a term you agreed to.

The job of this module is to get you from several proposals, each written on the contractor's own form with the contractor's own assumptions, to one comparison in which every column describes the same work. That process is called levelling (or "apples to apples"). It is clerical, slightly tedious, and the single highest-value hour you will spend before signing anything.

The judgment behind it

Price differences come from three sources: different scope (one bidder left something out), different assumptions (one bidder priced a worst case, another a best case), and different businesses (overhead, backlog, skill, how much risk the contractor is willing to carry). Only the third is a real difference in what you are buying. Levelling removes the first two so you can see the third.

Boundary

This module helps you understand and compare proposals. It does not interpret contracts. Payment terms, lien rights, indemnity, insurance requirements, dispute clauses and warranty language vary by jurisdiction and by document, and their meaning in your situation is a question for an attorney or another qualified adviser, not for a course. Where the course says "ask," it means ask someone qualified, and write down the answer.

2. Who you are hiring, and where to find them

What you are collecting depends on the role you chose in Module 1.

Your roleWhat you are comparingWhat that implies
Informed homeowner with a general contractor (GC)Two or three GC proposals for the whole job, or one GC's proposal you want to understand properlyThe GC prices and coordinates the trades. Your levelling is at the whole-job level: scope, allowances, exclusions, terms. You still ask who the key subcontractors are.
Coordinating alongside a hired contractor or consultantA GC or construction manager proposal, plus some trade proposals for work carved out of the GC's scope (often finishes, landscaping, specialty items)Two levels of levelling, and a new risk: the seams between the GC's scope and the carved-out work. Every seam needs a written owner of each task.
Prospective owner-builderSeparate proposals from each trade: excavation, concrete, framing, roofing, windows, plumbing, electrical, HVAC, insulation, drywall, finish carpentry, tile, paint, and so onNobody else is checking that the scopes fit together. The bid package has to do what a GC's experience would otherwise do, and gaps between trades become your cost. Experienced trades often prefer repeat contractor clients and may decline or price a one-off homeowner job higher; this is a real constraint, not a myth.

Where good trades come from

  • Your designer, architect or engineer. They see contractors' work finished and know who returns calls. Ask for three names and for the reason behind each name.
  • Suppliers. The lumberyard counter, the plumbing supply house, the tile showroom, the window dealer. They know who pays bills, who orders correctly and who is busy. Ask "who do you see doing careful work on jobs like mine?"
  • Other trades. A good electrician knows which plumbers leave a tidy site. Once you have one trade you trust, ask them.
  • The licensing authority's public lookup, where one exists. It tells you whether a license is current and, in many places, whether there are complaints or disciplinary actions. It does not tell you whether the work is good.
  • Neighbors with finished projects, especially ones a year old. Ask what went wrong and how it was handled; a contractor who handled a problem well is worth more than one who claims there were none.
  • Lead-generation sites and review platforms are where you start if you have nothing else, not where you stop. Reviews describe the sales experience more reliably than the construction experience.

Expect to contact two to three times as many contractors as you want proposals from. Some will not answer, some are booked for a year, some will walk the site and never send anything. That is normal and is not a judgment of your project.

3. What to check before you compare prices

Do these checks for every bidder who makes the shortlist. They take an hour per contractor and they remove the bidders whose low price is low because something is missing from their business rather than from their scope.

CheckHowWhat it tells you, and what it does not
License or registration, where your jurisdiction requires one for this type of workAsk for the license number; look it up on the licensing authority's own site, not the contractor's. Confirm the license class covers the work (a general license, a specialty license, or none required are all possible).Tells you the contractor has met that authority's requirements and whether discipline is on record. Does not tell you about skill. Whether a license is required for your project is a question for your jurisdiction (Module 4).
InsuranceAsk for a current certificate of insurance (COI) sent to you from the insurer or broker, showing general liability and, where the contractor has employees, workers' compensation. Note the expiry dates and the limits.Tells you coverage existed on the date issued. Many owners ask to be named as "additional insured" on the liability policy; whether that is appropriate for you, and what the limits should be, is a question for your own insurance agent. Uninsured workers injured on your property can become your problem in ways that vary by state; this is one of the questions in Module 4.
ReferencesAsk for three recent clients with similar work, and one from at least a year ago. Call them. Ask: Did it finish close to the schedule? How were changes priced and handled? What would you do differently? Did subcontractors or suppliers ever contact you about payment?Tells you how the contractor behaves when things go wrong, which is a large part of what you are buying. A contractor who offers no references, or only very recent ones, is telling you something.
Lien and complaint historyMany licensing authorities and some courts have public lookups for complaints, judgments and liens. A local attorney or title company can run a check if your project is large.A pattern of supplier liens suggests cash-flow trouble, which becomes your trouble through lien exposure (Module 6 and the verification list).
Who will actually be thereAsk who runs the job day to day, how many other jobs they run at once, and which trades are employees versus subcontractors.A proposal is signed by the owner; the job is run by the lead carpenter or the project manager. Meet that person.
The red flags consumer-protection agencies listLarge up-front deposits (some states cap deposits on home-improvement contracts; the exact rule is a verification item), cash-only or "no contract needed," pressure to sign today, a business with no fixed address, a contractor who wants you to pull the permit "to save money" when they are doing the work.Any one of these is a reason to stop and ask hard questions, and consumer-protection agencies treat several of them as reasons to walk away. The permit one deserves a sentence: in many jurisdictions the person who pulls the permit takes on responsibility for the work; a contractor asking you to pull it for their work is shifting that responsibility to you.

4. The bid package: giving everyone the same job

Levelling is only possible if every bidder priced the same job. The way to make that happen is to hand each one the same package and to answer every question so that everyone hears the answer. A bid package for a residential project contains:

  1. Drawings, as complete as they are. If the drawings are preliminary, say so, and say what will change. Bidders price uncertainty; the less they have to guess, the lower the guessing premium.
  2. Specifications or a finish schedule: what the materials are (not "tile" but "porcelain tile, 12 by 24, allowance $12 per square foot material, owner selects"), what the fixtures are, who supplies what.
  3. A scope narrative: one or two pages in plain language describing the work room by room or trade by trade, and the existing conditions you know about (year built, known lead paint or asbestos testing results, panel capacity, septic, access). This is the document that catches what drawings miss.
  4. The exclusions and the owner-supplied items list. Write down what the bidder should not price (appliances you are buying, the landscaping your cousin is doing) so they are left out of every proposal rather than some.
  5. The allowances list. For anything not yet selected, state the allowance you want every bidder to carry, so that allowances are identical and the differences are in labor, overhead and judgment. Module 6 explains how to size allowances.
  6. Schedule expectations: when you can start, any hard constraint, whether the house is occupied, working-hours limits.
  7. Site conditions: access, parking, where a dumpster can go, where materials can be stored, bathroom availability, power and water.
  8. A bid form: the line items you want prices broken into, so the proposals arrive in comparable shape. Even five lines (demolition and disposal; structure and framing; mechanical, electrical and plumbing; finishes; general conditions and overhead) make levelling far easier than three lump sums.
  9. Questions deadline and bid deadline. Promise that every question and its answer goes to every bidder. Then do it.
If you have no drawings yet

You can still get useful numbers, but call them what they are: estimates. Ask for a budget estimate with assumptions listed, and use Module 6 to interpret them. Do not try to level estimates against each other as if they were bids; the differences will be mostly in the assumptions, and you will learn more by reading the assumptions than by comparing the totals.

The walk-through

Walk every bidder through the site, ideally one at a time, with the same notes in your hand. Point at the things that are not on the drawings: the panel, the water heater, the crawlspace hatch, the path a dumpster would take, the room where the children sleep. Say what you know about the house's age and anything that has been tested. Then listen: a bidder's questions during the walk-through are the best preview you will get of how they think.

Questions worth asking every bidder

  • What in this scope are you least certain about pricing, and how did you handle that uncertainty in your number?
  • Which parts would you subcontract, and to whom?
  • What do you need from me, and by when, for the schedule you are proposing to hold?
  • How do you price a change? Who signs it, and when, relative to the work?
  • What happens if you open the wall and find something unexpected? Walk me through the last time that happened.
  • Who pulls the permit, and who schedules inspections?
  • What is excluded that a homeowner usually assumes is included?

Write the answers down, in the bid comparison worksheet, next to the proposal they belong to. The last question is the one that pays for the walk-through.

5. Price structures, allowances and payment terms

How the price is built

StructureHow it worksWhere the risk sits
Lump sum (fixed price)One price for the defined scope. Changes to scope are priced as change orders.The contractor carries the risk of their own estimating errors on the defined scope; you carry the risk of an incomplete definition. Works best with complete drawings.
Cost-plus (cost plus a fee)You pay actual costs of labor, materials and subcontractors, plus a fee (a percentage or a fixed amount). Often with a "not to exceed" or a guaranteed maximum.You carry most cost risk and get transparency in return; the quality of the records matters enormously. Common when drawings are incomplete or the existing conditions are unknown.
Time and materials (T&M)Hourly rates plus materials, often with a markup. Common for small or exploratory work and for unforeseen conditions inside a lump-sum job.Open-ended by nature. Agree the rates, the markup, and a reporting rhythm (daily hours, weekly totals) before the first hour.
Unit priceA price per unit (per square foot of tile, per linear foot of trench) for quantities that cannot be known in advance.Useful for the uncertain part of an otherwise fixed job. Agree how quantities will be measured and by whom.

Allowances

An allowance is a placeholder sum in the price for something not yet selected: "countertop allowance $6,500 installed." If your selection costs more, you pay the difference (often plus markup); if less, you get a credit (often without the markup). Two things go wrong with allowances. First, a bidder sets them low so the total looks good; the cost arrives later as "overages." Second, an allowance is ambiguous about what it covers: material only, or material and labor; delivered or not; tax or not. Every allowance in a levelled comparison needs the same definition. Module 8 covers how selections turn allowances into real numbers.

Payment terms you will see

  • Deposit. Money before work. Some states limit the deposit a home-improvement contractor can take; the limit, if any, is a verification item for your jurisdiction. A large deposit on a lump-sum job transfers risk to you for no reduction in price.
  • Progress payments on milestones ("at completion of rough-in inspections"), or on a schedule of values (a list of the job's parts with a value for each; you pay the percentage complete each period). Milestones tied to passed inspections are easy to verify. Percentages are not, unless someone qualified is assessing them.
  • Retainage. A percentage held from each payment until the work is complete and accepted. Five to ten percent is common in commercial work; in residential work it is negotiated or absent. It is the owner's main leverage for the punch list.
  • Lien waivers. In many jurisdictions, subcontractors and suppliers who are not paid by the contractor can claim against your property even though you paid the contractor. A lien waiver or release from each sub and supplier, exchanged for each payment, is the usual protection. Whether that applies where you live, and what form the waiver must take, is a verification item and an adviser's question.
  • Change order terms: how changes are priced (cost plus a markup percentage is common), whether work can begin before the change is signed, and who may sign for each side.
  • Warranty: what is covered, for how long, and who you call. A one-year workmanship warranty is common in residential proposals; manufacturers' warranties on products are separate and often need registration (Module 11).
A line you will see

"Any unforeseen conditions to be billed at time and materials." This is not unreasonable on its own; nobody can price what nobody can see. It becomes a problem when the rate, the markup, the reporting and the approval process are unstated. Ask for all four, and ask for a written notice before the T&M clock starts.

6. See it: three fictional proposals for one kitchen See it

Fictional example

The Alder Street kitchen, its owners, the three contractors and every number below are invented for teaching. The scope, the terms and the mistakes are realistic; the names are not real businesses.

The scope as the owners described it in a two-page narrative with a designer's plan: a 1958 single-story house; remove the existing 180-square-foot kitchen to the studs; remove a nine-foot section of the wall to the dining room (an engineer's letter in the package states the wall is non-bearing); new owner-supplied cabinets installed by the contractor; new countertops, tile backsplash and flooring (not yet selected); relocate the sink four feet along the same wall and add a dishwasher; new electrical circuits, eight recessed lights and under-cabinet lighting; drywall, paint; owner supplies appliances. The package said the town requires a building permit with electrical and plumbing permits, that the house is occupied, and that the dumpster can sit in the driveway.

Three proposals came back. Here they are, condensed, with the lines that matter marked.

Proposal A: Northline Remodeling, $48,900

Demolition of existing kitchen to studs. Remove wall section per plan. Frame new opening, drywall, tape, paint kitchen (2 coats). Install owner-supplied cabinets. Countertop allowance: $3,500.Material? Installed? A fabricated stone countertop for this kitchen is unlikely to come in at this figure installed. Tile backsplash: $900 material allowance, labor included. Flooring allowance: $1,800.Lowest of the three by a wide margin; definition not stated. Electrical: new circuits per code, 8 recessed lights, under-cabinet lighting."Per code" is not a quantity. How many circuits? Who decides? Plumbing: relocate sink; dishwasher connection. Excludes: permit fees; dumpster and disposal (by owner); electrical panel upgrade if required; patching or painting outside the kitchen; appliance hookup.Five items the other bidders include. Each becomes an owner cost or a change order. Unforeseen conditions billed T&M at $85/hr plus materials plus 20%.Rate is stated; approval process and notice are not. Payment: 50% deposit, balance on completion.Half the price before any work. Check whether your state limits deposits; regardless, this moves risk to the owner. Schedule: 6 to 8 weeks. Start 2 weeks after deposit. Warranty: not stated. License number: not shown.

Proposal B: Hale & Daughters Construction, $63,400

Permit application and inspections coordination; permit fees estimated $650, billed at cost. Protection: floor protection in hall and dining room, plastic containment, HEPA air scrubber during demolition and sanding. Demolition to studs, dumpster and disposal included. Remove wall section per engineer's letter. Framing of opening; drywall and patching of dining room wall and ceiling where the wall is removed; paint kitchen and dining room ceiling. Install owner-supplied cabinets (assumes cabinets delivered assembled, on site by week 4). Countertop allowance: $6,500 installed (template, fabrication, install; owner selects material). Tile allowance: $1,200 material for approx. 40 sq ft; labor, thinset, grout included. Flooring allowance: $4,200 installed. Electrical: four new 20A circuits, 8 recessed lights, under-cabinet LED, panel evaluation included; panel upgrade excluded, priced as alternate: $2,900.The quantity is stated and the uncertain item is priced separately. This is what a well-handled unknown looks like. Plumbing: relocate sink with new supply and drain, dishwasher connection, appliance hookup included. Payment: 10% at signing; progress payments per schedule of values at demolition complete, rough-in inspections passed, cabinets installed, substantial completion; 5% retainage released at punch-list completion. Changes: written change order signed by both before work proceeds; priced at cost plus 15%. Warranty: 1 year workmanship. License no. and certificate of insurance attached. Schedule: 7 weeks from permit issuance. Permit review in this town typically 2 to 4 weeks; not within our control.

Proposal C: Marrow Design-Build, $79,800

Includes everything in the scope narrative plus: design coordination (kitchen designer, 8 hours), dedicated project manager, weekly owner meeting, daily cleanup. Electrical panel upgrade to 200A included.Priced in whether or not it turns out to be required. Countertop allowance $8,000 installed; tile allowance $1,500 material; flooring allowance $4,800 installed. Excludes: appliances (owner); plumbing fixtures (owner to supply sink and faucet); painting of dining room.The fixture exclusion is easy to miss. The others include fixtures within their plumbing line or an allowance. Payment: 15% deposit; monthly progress billing on percent complete; 10% retainage. Changes: cost plus 18%, signed before work. Warranty: 2 years workmanship. Schedule: 9 weeks from permit. Earliest start: 10 weeks from signing (current backlog).

Before reading on, notice your own reaction. Most people feel pulled toward A because the number is small and toward C because it sounds like fewer headaches. Neither feeling is information yet.

7. Practice: level the three proposals Practice

Time: about 45 minutes. Open the bid comparison worksheet and load its example rows, which contain these three proposals. Then:

  1. List every scope item in the package down the left column, one per row, including the ones only some bidders mentioned (permit fees, dumpster, patching, hookup, panel, fixtures, dining room paint).
  2. For each row and each bidder, write one of: included (and the amount, if broken out), excluded, allowance (with the definition), or not mentioned. "Not mentioned" is its own category: it means unconfirmed, not excluded, and it is where surprises live until you ask.
  3. Choose the levelling basis. Pick one allowance figure per selection item (the course suggests the middle bidder's, because they were defined most clearly) and apply it to all three. Add a reasonable cost for every excluded or unmentioned item so that each column describes the full job. Use round figures and write down where they came from.
  4. Treat the unknown separately. The panel upgrade may or may not be required. Produce two levelled totals per bidder: with and without it.
  5. Write the questions that levelling raised, per bidder, in the worksheet's questions column. Those questions go to the bidders before you decide anything.

Then compare your levelled totals with the worked example in Check your work.

8. Your project Your project

9. Check your work Check your work

Criteria

  • Every scope item appears as a row, and every cell says included, excluded, allowance or not mentioned. No blanks.
  • Allowances are identical across columns after levelling, with the same definition (installed versus material only).
  • Every exclusion has a cost added, with its source noted, or an explicit decision that you will carry it yourself at a stated amount.
  • Unknowns (the panel) are shown as alternatives, not buried in one column.
  • Terms that are not money (deposit, retainage, change pricing, warranty, start date) are listed in their own rows so they are compared, not forgotten.
  • A question list exists for each bidder.

Worked levelling

Adjustment (to the middle bidder's basis)A: NorthlineB: Hale & DaughtersC: Marrow
Proposal total48,90063,40079,800
Permit fees (B's estimate, at cost)+650includedincluded
Dumpster and disposal (local quote)+900includedincluded
Patching and paint outside kitchen+800included+600 (dining room paint excluded)
Appliance hookup+400includedincluded
Countertop allowance levelled to $6,500 installed+3,0000−1,500
Tile allowance levelled to $1,200 material+3000−300
Flooring allowance levelled to $4,200 installed+2,4000−600
Plumbing fixtures (sink, faucet)not mentioned: asknot mentioned: askexcluded: owner buys (say 900, outside all three)
Levelled total, panel not required57,35063,40075,100 (exercise assumption: C's panel credited at B's alternate price, −2,900; what C would actually credit is a question for C)
Levelled total, panel required60,250 (A's "if required" at B's alternate price)66,30078,000

What the levelling shows. The apparent gap between A and B was $14,500. After levelling, it is between $6,050 and $6,100, and that remaining gap buys: a defined electrical quantity instead of "per code," containment and air scrubbing in an occupied house, a 10 percent deposit instead of 50 percent, written change orders before work, retainage, a stated warranty, a license number and an insurance certificate. Whether those are worth about six thousand dollars is now a real question you can put to yourself and to the bidders, which is what levelling is for. The levelled totals are still estimates built on your own assumptions; the real cost is settled only by the contract and by what the walls contain. The gap between B and C, about $11,700 on this worksheet, rests partly on an assumption the worksheet makes for want of better information: that C would credit the panel at B's price. Until C answers, that figure is an estimate of the gap, not the gap. What the remaining gap buys is design coordination, a project manager, a two-year warranty, and a ten-week wait. Again a real question. Note that A's T&M clause for unforeseen conditions has no price at all in this table, because its cost depends on what the walls contain; in a 1958 house that is not nothing.

Common mistakes

  • Levelling to the lowest allowance. It makes every bid look cheaper and every selection later look like an overage. Level to a realistic figure, usually the clearest bidder's.
  • Counting "included" as settled. "Electrical per code" is included and undefined. Ask for quantities.
  • Ignoring the start date. A proposal that cannot start for ten weeks may be the right one; it is still a ten-week cost in rent, interest or patience that belongs in the comparison.
  • Letting the deposit slide because the number is good. Deposit size is risk, and risk is price.
  • Treating a bidder's silence as inclusion. If it is not mentioned, its inclusion is unconfirmed. Ask, and document the answer; some bidders do carry unmentioned items, and the only way to know is to ask.

What is still unresolved after levelling

  • Whether the panel upgrade is required (an electrician's assessment, possibly the utility's), and what C would actually credit if it were removed from their scope; the worksheet assumed B's alternate price for both, which is a levelling convenience, not C's number.
  • Whether the sink and faucet are in A's and B's prices.
  • Whether your jurisdiction limits deposits or requires specific contract terms for home improvement work (verification list).
  • What A's licensing and insurance situation is; until shown, A is not comparable at all.
  • What each bidder would do with a surprise behind the wall, in writing.

10. Knowledge check and scenario

A bidder's proposal is $9,000 below the others. What are the three possible reasons, and which one matters?
Different scope (something is left out), different assumptions (they priced a best case), or a genuinely different business (lower overhead, lighter backlog, more risk appetite). Only the third is a real difference in what you are buying; levelling exists to remove the first two so you can see whether the third is present.
"Countertop allowance $5,000." Name three ambiguities in that line.
Material only or installed (template, fabrication, installation)? Does it include tax and delivery? What happens to the markup on an overage, and is the credit on an underage net of markup? A fourth: who selects, and by when.
Why does the course treat "not mentioned" as a separate category from "excluded"?
An exclusion is a conscious decision by the bidder and is visible. An item not mentioned may have been forgotten, assumed to be someone else's, or quietly included; until you ask, you do not know which. The first two surface later as change orders or disputes. Finding unmentioned items and asking about them is much of the work of levelling.
What does a certificate of insurance prove, and what does it not?
It shows that the stated coverage existed on the date the certificate was issued, with the limits shown. It does not prove the policy is still in force on the day of an accident, that the limits are adequate for your project, or that you are covered; those are questions for your own insurance agent, and some owners ask to be named additional insured and to be notified of cancellation.
Your friend says: "Pull the permit yourself as the homeowner; it is cheaper and the contractor said it is fine." What is the course's concern?
In many jurisdictions the permit holder takes on responsibility for the work meeting requirements, and a contractor who asks the owner to pull the permit for the contractor's work is shifting that responsibility, and sometimes avoiding a licensing check. Whether you may pull a permit, and what that makes you responsible for, is a question for your building department, not a cost-saving tip.
Scenario: the low bidder calls. "I can start Monday, but I need the 50 percent deposit today to hold the slot. The others will keep you waiting two months." You like this contractor and the levelled gap is about six thousand dollars. What do you do?
The levelling did its job and then you ignored what it found. The six-thousand-dollar gap included no price for the T&M clause, no license or insurance evidence, and a deposit structure that puts half the job's value at risk before demolition. Speed is worth something; it is not worth signing before the open questions are answered. If the contractor is good, they can answer them by Friday.
This is the course's answer. You neither reject a possibly good contractor for a sales habit nor reward the pressure. The questions are the ones levelling produced, so they are specific and quick to answer. The response tells you a great deal: a contractor who sends the license, the certificate and the quantities, and offers 10 percent with milestone payments, has given you what you need to compare them with B on the same basis, and the comparison, not the response, then decides. One who repeats the deadline has answered differently.
Defensible, and consumer-protection agencies would not argue with you. But it may cost you a decent contractor with a bad sales habit. The course prefers the middle path: give a short, specific deadline and a specific list, and let the response decide. If the list is not answered, then walk away, and you will know why.

Before you move on

Records your learning only; it is not a qualification.